| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 10 post(s) |
Mu'n Hurricane
Minmatar
Federal Defence Union
   |
Posted - 2010.07.28 12:44:00 -
[1]
 That's some huge ignorance, CCP. ****ing No. Fix your game. You care more about stupid The Sims clone (incarna) and shooter that won't make into tops (dust).
Look what CCP did to my cat!!! 
|
Mu'n Hurricane
Minmatar
Federal Defence Union
|
Posted - 2010.07.28 19:45:00 -
[2]
CCP hired guys from Lucas team? CCP, you don't hire guys from Lucas team. 
 Originally by: CCP Manifest
I brought up this specific thread in this morning's EVE marketing meeting, and it will appear in my "EVE press mention roundup" email either later today or tomorrow, which is widely read throughout CCP.
Not only marketing team should get it, the scale and the dangers of the current problems with eve should be clear to anyone who has anything to do with making decisions and implementing them - everyone in CCP, I suppose. Especially executives.
If problems not fixed and more things implemented - you get rolling ball of problems. Current development policy and distribution of resourses will ruin eve even more.
To be honest, the marketing team seems to be out of touch with reality, if they have something to do with that mad priorities in development. Are you sure you hired no guys who worked with Lucas before?;)
|
Mu'n Hurricane
Minmatar
Federal Defence Union
|
Posted - 2010.07.31 15:50:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Mu''n Hurricane on 31/07/2010 15:50:20
Hey, guys, guys! It's not in CCP policy to fix things. The goal is to sell new features. And then some more new features. Because data shows that it gives more bucks!.. a shortsighted crap.
Read the 14.30 - 15.30 part.
http://www.eveonline.com/council/transcripts/2010/CSM_CCP_Meetings_23-25_06_2010.pdf
|
Mu'n Hurricane
Minmatar
Federal Defence Union
|
Posted - 2010.07.31 21:02:00 -
[4]
CCP should read some books about failed companies with no effective system of working with feedback from customers and no desire to change things in services or in hiring policies and current staff. Such companies ignored issues, they made no changes, they innovated not, they went bankrupt.
|
| |
|